So many researches were borned
before government to decide raising fuel on middle of 2013. Researcher’s team
from 3 top rank university had ever been recommended three ways for government
created optimal fuel subsidize policy. First, the team proposed to raise fuel
price for Rp.500,00, and realocation subsidize to public transportations. It
could be compensation and vague potential infaltion to be higher. Second, all
of users of private transportation have to move from premium (RON 88) to
pertamax (RON 92). It’s cleared to reduce fuel subsidize. Third, we could be
used fuel consumption controlled system to restrict over demand. But, since the
team proposed recommendation around on middle of 2011, there’re no one of
recommendation to propose parliament. At the end, results of comprehensive
research had never been based government to make policy for fuel prices.
Now, after almost 2 years, the government
have to create new policy about fuel price. Adjusment price need to do now,
cause fuel subsidized around Rp.297,7 T or 46,01 million kilo litres, cause its
makes heavy use for national budget. With total of subsidize around Rp.446,8 T
or 26 % of national budget. This means budget for subsidize over than education
budget, its shows possibility misallocation of national budget. Because many
studies had been showed almost 70% fuel subsidize to give benefit for middle to
rich people and the rest felt of poor people. By rational its makes sense the
owner of private transportation only for both of middle and rich class. However
there’re consequency created new poor people if fuel price have to raising. I
think it’s interesting, the government in the middle position, the dilemma for
regulator commonly happened so Indonesia can learn by western countries when
they’re made policy to reduce fuel price subsidize.
I believed almost economists know
consequencies when fuel price raising. So, always there’re solution to
compensate fuel price raising. We can say the government too late, if they just
understand to raise fuel price are important. In spite of that Government
should prepare all of possibility happened after fuel price raising. Still be
better late rather than steady on keep fuel price on Rp.4.500. However,
discussion within government and parliament, just will schedule on middle of
May 2013. We hope the discussion can be created optimalized policy about fuel
price. And it’s more important to know consequencies after implementation of
policy. So, the anticipation can be early to reduce bad impact for Indonesia
economy. If economic interest still has been prioritized rather than politics,
we believe fuel price raising has been optimal policy, but they must decide how
much price have to increase? It’s still on debate able within of them.
Consequencies of fuel price increasing
Now, Indonesia has got economic
growth 6,2 % on 2012, its second best growth after China cause global economics
is still on suffered, just created growth 3% under normal criteria realeased by
IMF. As second best growth perfomanced in the world, Indonesia has been
interesting point for foreign investor come to invest. Indonesia has not only
been good economic performance, but also Indonesia offer high yield for
investor rather than other countries, even some contries has been yields near
0%. So, as country with investment grade rating bring consequencies for
fundamental economy. At the end, Indonesia has to be ready to welcome demand
for capital product, consumption (fuels, food stuff, etc), and others, will
increase and bring consequencies for domestic economy. One of phenomena today
is about trend of increasing fuel subsidized consumption each years. It’s one
impact of economic growth of Indonesia. I think its common phenomenon when
economic growth drive increasing consumption, investment, government
expenditure, and net export.
In Economics Studies, when
planned aggregate expenditure lower than aggregate expenditure, they will
increase spending until closed equlibrium point. Indonesia has been higher
equilibrium point cause component likes government expenditure, public
consumption, and investment, increase in same times and create new equilibrium.
At the end, economic expansion will be moved toward new equilibrium point. So,
the government has to adjust fuel subsidy price because subsidized allocation
in national budget nearby 50 percent. It’s critical situation, in other side
government has to allocate budget to suport investment and industry facilities
such as infrastructures, power plants, and research and development. So,
government must take position to increase fuel price and to reduce fuel
subsidy, i think its will be smart policy because we can reallocate budget to
other sectors surely give more benefit for Indonesia’s Economy.
Now, increasing fuel subsidy
price have to do immediately. Because every industry needs certainty supply of
fuel, to grow their business. That’s why to suport the high intensity of
economy condition, policy for increasing subsidy fuel price need to do as soon
as possible. However, the policy will has some consequencies for Indonesia’s
macroeconomy. First, Increasing fuel price has got to drive higher inflation. it
means production cost will be increasing too in line with fuel price. At the
end, price product will increase following fuel price as input factor of
production. Second, increasing fuel subsidy price will be brought down
willingness to pay for people. Without growth of income, increasing fuel
subsidy price will potential reduce willingness to pay. At the end, people
welfare are down because purchasing power of money being down too. Third, the
policy will create potential new poor people. With higher of inflation and
downing of purchasing power are indicators to know potential wideness of poor
people.
But, for this situation
government don’t have to worry because many social program has been built to
reduce and strengthen people life around and under poverty line. we know about
Jamkesmas, program keluarga harapan (PKH), raskin, bantuan siswa miskin (BSM),
PNPM Mandiri, bantuan operasional sekolah (BOS), and kredit usaha rakyat (KUR). All programs
have been run for some years ago, it means these programs have been giving
benefit to people. So, with assume these programs can run optimal, i believed
that increasing fuel subsidy price can not
disturb Indonesia economy
stabilize in the long run. Intead of the policy to increase fuel subsidy
price can keep momentum growth domestic economy. At the end, no space reason
for government has not to increasing fuel subsidy price, except if parliament disapproved.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar